In all the fuss over what Maliki meant, whether he favored Obama’s position and whether this is evidence of the accuracy of Obama’s views, two points are worth remembering. First, if Obama had his way, there would be no Maliki, it would be Saddam. Second, if Obama had his way, there would have been no “surge” to allow Maliki to consider the possibility of American troops departing. Obama remains a bad impression of Jimmy Carter.
Charles Krauthammer notes that Obama seems unconnected to what is happening in Iraq. In his St. Paul victory speech, Barack Obama pledged again to pull ...
The Washington Post does a hit job on Jimmy Carter's trip, by the simple step of publishing a piece by Hamas foreign minister Mahmoud al-Zahar. ...
Chirac does a Jimmy Carter Everyone remember Jimmy Carter, back in the 1980 debates, citing his daughter Amy's views on nuclear weapons? Now it is ...
Thomas Sowell has dubbed Obama "Charlatan-in-Chief", and I have no quarrel with that. For now, though, I will settle for Hypocrite-in-Chief, at Jimmy Carter levels ...
Michael Tomasky, the Guardian's chief Obama whore American editor, writes a pitiful excuse for Obama continuing to send his kids to private while serving as ...
In a review of Arthur Schlesinger's Journals in the New York Review of Bores Books, Joseph Lelyveld remarks on something I did not know: "I ...
Black conservative leader Deneen Borelli, a senior fellow with the Project 21 black leadership network, says she's not thankful - at least not yet - ...